Bonus Terms Comparison
Type two offers’ terms and compare expected clearing cost. Not a ranking of casinos. 18+ only.
Amounts are shown in dollarsfor reading — the arithmetic is the same. This is not an operator’s settlement currency.
Enter the numbers above and press Compare the terms.
How this is calculated
Effective turnover
qualifying base × multiple ÷ contribution
Expected cost
effective turnover × (100% − RTP)
Estimated theoretical value
bonus − expected cost
One offer at a time is on the bonus true-value calculator. The sourcing contract is on the methodology page.
Worked example (hypothetical)
Both at 96% RTP and 100% contribution. Offer A: $100 bonus, 35x. Offer B: $50 bonus, 40x.
- Offer A expected cost
- $3,500 × 4% = $140
- Offer B expected cost
- $2,000 × 4% = $80
- Lower expected cost
- Offer B under these assumptions
Assumptions and limitations
- Max cashout, sticky rules, and game lists are outside the model.
- A 2% gap in expected cost is treated as similar.
- This is education, not gambling, legal, tax, or financial advice.
Play within limits
A smaller expected cost is not a reason to play bigger. If gambling is causing harm, use the responsible gambling page. 18+ only.
Frequently asked questions
Does a lower expected cost mean I should take that offer?
No. It only means that, under the numbers you typed, one sheet’s clearing cost is smaller. Real offers include terms this worksheet ignores.
Why isn’t this a list of live bonuses?
We do not publish an offer database. Freshness, GEO, and operator terms are out of scope until those facts can be sourced. You type both sides.
What does theoretical value mean here?
Bonus amount minus the long-run expected cost of the required turnover at the RTP you entered. It is not a session prediction.
No affiliate links: this page has no paid operator placements or commission links. A sister-brand handoff to AskCasinoAI, when it appears, is a network link — not an affiliate offer. Read the full affiliate disclosure.